What's New

The latest additions to the campaign website:

Coming Up

Upcoming campaign events:

2 January 2010
first day petitions for signatures in lieu of filing fees to be available for candidates in 8 June 2010 primary

  

P&F Campaigns in Sacramento County

Local Candidates

State Senate

There were no Peace and Freedom Party candidates for State Senate in Sacramento County.

U.S. House of Representatives

Dina Padilla of Citrus Heights was the P&F candidate for the U.S. House of Representatives in the 3rd Congressional District, which includes much of Sacramento County (including the cities of Citrus Heights, Folsom, Galt, and almost all of Elk Grove, and the communities of Elverta, Antelope, Carmichael, Fair Oaks, Gold River, Rancho Murieta, Clay, Wilton, Courtland and Hood), as well as all of Alpine, Amador and Calaveras counties, and the northern and eastern portions of Solano County. She came in third of four candidates, with 13,378 votes (4.26%)) district-wide, with 11,708 votes (4.40%) in Sacramento County.

Linda "LR" Roberts of Sacramento ran for Congress in the 5th Congressional District, which is entirely within Sacramento County, containing the city of Sacramento, part of Rancho Cordova, and some nearby unincorporated areas including all or part of the communities of Florin, Rosemont, Arden and North Highlands. She came in third of four candidates (three on the ballot and one official write-in), with 10,731 votes (4.85%).

Gene Ruyle of Oakland ran for Congress in the 10th Congressional District, which includes the city of Isleton in the southwest corner of Sacramento County, as well as large parts of Contra Costa and Solano counties and a small part of Alameda County. He came in third of three candidates, with 11,062 votes (3.75%) district-wide, with 61 votes (5.32%) in Sacramento County.

State Assembly

Karen Martinez of Citrus Heights was the Peace and Freedom Party candidate for Assembly in the 5th Assembly District, which includes northern portions of Sacramento County (Folsom, Fair Oaks, Orangevale, Citrus Heights, North Highlands, Foothill Farms, Arden-Arcade, Elverta, and parts of the city of Sacramento north of I-80, or east of CSUS and north of US-50, or in a neighborhood just north of Cal Expo) and Granite Bay in Placer County. She came in third of three candidates, with 14,295 votes (7.61%) district-wide, with 13,751 votes (7.78%) in Sacramento County.

Gerald Frink of Sacramento was the Peace and Freedom Party candidate for Assembly in the 9th Assembly District, which is entirely within Sacramento county, including most of the city of Sacramento (excluding the area north of I-80, except for a few miscellaneous blocks and the area bounded by Northgate Boulevard on the west, Main Avenue on the north and Norwood Avenue on the east, and also excluding CSUS and the areas near it east of Power Inn Road) and the communities of Parkway-South Sacramento. He came in third of three candidates, with 7,744 votes (6.13%).

Local Non-partisan Offices

The webmaster is not aware of any endorsements by the Sacramento County Peace and Freedom Party organization of any candidates for local non-partisan offices which were voted on in the November 4th general election.

Local Measures

The webmaster is not aware of any positions taken by the Sacramento County Peace and Freedom Party organization on any county, municipal or regional measures that were on the ballot November 4th in Sacramento County.

Presidential Ticket

The candidates on the Peace and Freedom Party's Presidential ticket were:

Statewide, the ticket came in third of ten candidates (six on the ballot and four official write-ins), with 108,381 votes (0.80%). In Sacramento County the Nader/Gonzalez ticket had 4,705 votes (0.87%).

The Nader/Gonzalez campaign had a local campaign office in Sacramento, at 1501 21st Street. The office phone number was 916/448-3413.

Statewide Measures

There were twelve propositions on the statewide ballot November 4th, numbered 1A and 2 through 12. The Peace and Freedom Party took positions in favor of Propositions 2 and 5 and against Propositions 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11.

  • Proposition 1A (see Smart Voter page for more "neutral" information): "Safe, Reliable High-Speed Passenger Train." This measure will issue almost $10 billion in bonds to be used for a high-speed train service linking Southern California, the Sacramento/San Joaquin Valley, and the San Francisco Bay Area, with at least 90 percent of bond funds spent for specific projects and with federal and private matching funds required. The Peace and Freedom Party generally opposes bond measures, as increasing the costs of projects while benefiting the rich who buy tax-exempt bonds, but we're generally in favor of improving rail systems to replace inefficient and polluting automobile and air transportation. If it had been clear that Proposition 1A would really build a good rail system, we probably would have reluctantly supported it. If it had been clear that Proposition 1A was a boondoggle for real estate and construction interests that built a poor or mediocre rail system as a side product, we would have opposed it. Neither was clearly the case. The Peace and Freedom Party decided not to take a position on Proposition 1A. Proposition 1A passed by a statewide vote of 6,680,485 (52.7%) Yes to 6,015,944 (47.3%). In Sacramento County, the vote was 246,221 (47.7%) to 269,646 (52.3%).
  • Proposition 2 (see Smart Voter page for more "neutral" information): "Standards for Confining Farm Animals." This initiative measure was intended to reduce animal cruelty and improve food safety. The Peace and Freedom Party urged you to vote YES on 2. With our support, Proposition 2 passed by a statewide vote of 8,203,769 (63.5%) Yes to 4,731,738 (36.5%). In Sacramento County, the vote was 309,808 (59.3%) to 212,795 (40.7%).
  • Proposition 3 (see Smart Voter page for more "neutral" information): "Children's Hospital Bond Act. Grant Program." While children's health care is a worthy cause, the combination of bond financing and private medical care corporation involvement means that only 25% to 40% of the money would actually go to the promised programs. The Peace and Freedom Party urged you to vote NO on 3. Despite our opposition, Proposition 3 passed by a statewide vote of 6,984,319 (55.3%) Yes to 5,654,586 (44.7%) No. In Sacramento County, the vote was 237,948 (46.7%) to 271,508 (53.3%).
  • Proposition 4 (see Smart Voter page for more "neutral" information): "Waiting Period and Parental Notification Before Termination of Minor's Pregnancy." This was the third try by the sponsors, whose first two initiatives were defeated by the voters. This poorly-drawn, overreaching, backhanded end-run around Roe v. Wade should have been defeated again. The Peace and Freedom Party urged you to vote NO on 4. With our opposition, Proposition 4 was defeated by a statewide vote of 6,220,473 (48.0%) Yes to 6,728,478 (52.0%) No. In Sacramento County, the vote was 240,508 (46.2%) to 279,444 (53.8%).
  • Proposition 5 (see Smart Voter page for more "neutral" information): "Nonviolent Drug Offenses, Sentencing, Parole and Rehabilitation." This measure would have required more drug treatment and provided alternatives to incarceration. It would have saved money now wasted on imprisonment of non-violent offenders. The Peace and Freedom Party urged you to vote YES on 5. Despite our support, Proposition 5 was defeated by a statewide vote of 5,155,206 (40.5%) Yes to 7,566,783 (59.5%) No. In Sacramento County, the vote was 183,291 (35.6%) to 330,247 (64.4%).
  • Proposition 6 (see Smart Voter page for more "neutral" information): "Police and Law Enforcement Funding. Criminal Penalties and Laws." The "Runner Initiative," named after its fanatical right-wing proponents, would have put more people, especially young people, in jail for lesser and lesser crimes, and taken money away from schools and hospitals. This is the opposite of what California needs. The Peace and Freedom Party urged you to vote NO on 6. With our opposition, Proposition 6 was defeated by a statewide vote of 3,824,372 (30.8%) Yes to 8,559,647 (69.2%) No. In Sacramento County, the vote was 151,892 (30.2%) to 350,584 (69.8%).
  • Proposition 7 (see Smart Voter page for more "neutral" information): "Renewable Energy Generation." This plan, apparently written to benefit a few companies, was so badly drawn that almost all environmental groups opposed it. The Peace and Freedom Party urged you to vote NO on 7. With our opposition, Proposition 7 was defeated by a statewide vote of 4,502,235 (35.5%) Yes to 8,155,181 (64.5%) No. In Sacramento County, the vote was 172,707 (33.7%) to 338,387 (66.3%).
  • Proposition 8 (see Smart Voter page for more "neutral" information): "Eliminates Right of Same-Sex Couples to Marry." This one was just plain bad. It would take away the legal right of same-sex couples to marry, and throw into legal limbo existing same-sex marriages. It would enact bigotry, which is why it needed to be defeated. The Peace and Freedom Party urged you to vote NO on 8. Despite our opposition, Proposition 8 passed by a statewide vote of 7,001,084 (52.3%) Yes to 6,401,482 (47.7%) No. In Sacramento County, the vote was 289,378 (53.9%) to 248,444 (46.1%).
  • Proposition 9 (see Smart Voter page for more "neutral" information): "Criminal Justice System. Victims' Rights. Parole." This measure was designed to further increase the prison population, in part by undercutting the already slim chance that prisoners who pose no further risk to society can be paroled. It will be a remarkably bad law. The Peace and Freedom Party urged you to vote NO on 9. Despite our opposition, Proposition 9 passed by a statewide vote of 6,682,465 (53.9%) Yes to 5,728,968 (46.1%) No. In Sacramento County, the vote was 255,179 (51.7%) to 239,041 (48.3%).
  • Proposition 10 (see Smart Voter page for more "neutral" information): "Alternative Fuel Vehicles and Renewable Energy. Bonds." The bond financing would have more than doubled the cost of this program, which was not well-targeted in the first place. It mainly was meant to further enrich one billionaire. The Peace and Freedom Party supports alternative energy, but not through this expensive bond program. The Peace and Freedom Party urged you to vote NO on 10. With our opposition, Proposition 10 was defeated by a statewide vote of 5,098,666 (40.5%) Yes to 7,464,154 (59.5%) No. In Sacramento County, the vote was 179,331 (35.9%) to 318,992 (64.1%).
  • Proposition 11 (see Smart Voter page for more "neutral" information): "Redistricting." This scheme will slightly rearrange how the wealthy control the state legislature, but will do nothing to challenge their stranglehold on power. We need proportional representation through multiple-member districts, and an end to big-money control of politics. This one was not worth our support. The Peace and Freedom Party urged you to vote NO on 11. Despite our opposition, Proposition 11 passed by a statewide vote of 6,095,033 (50.9%) Yes to 5,897,655 (49.1%) No. In Sacramento County, the vote was 266,967 (55.8%) to 211,570 (44.2%).
  • Proposition 12 (see Smart Voter page for more "neutral" information): "Veteran's Bond Act of 2008." This measure will issue $900 million in bonds, but they will be paid back by the veterans who buy homes with its assistance. The state's role is only to guarantee the bonds, allowing veterans to borrow money to buy homes at lower interest rates, and none of the Veterans Bond Acts over the last half-century have cost taxpayers a cent. The nature of the program was enough to overcome our general opposition to bonds, but its benefits being limited to military veterans kept us from supporting it. The Peace and Freedom Party decided not to take a position on Proposition 12. Proposition 12 passed by a statewide vote of 7,807,630 (63.6%) Yes to 4,481,196 (36.4%) No. In Sacramento County, the vote was 277,515 (56.7%) to 212,145 (43.3%).
 

How you can help

Sign up now for the campaign email list